Summary
holding that state's concession to trial court did not preclude assertion or consideration of conceded ground on appeal
Summary of this case from Cruz v. Multnomah Cnty.Opinion
October 4, 2000
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 4, 2000
331 Or. 193 (Or. 2000)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 4, 2000
331 Or. 193 (Or. 2000)
holding that state's concession to trial court did not preclude assertion or consideration of conceded ground on appeal
Summary of this case from Cruz v. Multnomah Cnty.holding that courts must consider the issue of justiciability sua sponte, because it affects the court's jurisdiction to enter a judgment
Summary of this case from Utsey v. Coos Countyaffirming under "right for the wrong reason" doctrine where the state's concession at the trial court level did not "materially affect[] the development of the record"
Summary of this case from In re C. Saddressing preservation principles
Summary of this case from State v. Bridgemanexplaining "settled rule" that a reviewing court will not disturb a decision of a lower court where the result is correct, even though the lower court relied on a wrong ground or gave a wrong reason; citing cases
Summary of this case from Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Case details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Oct 4, 2000
Citations
331 Or. 193 (Or. 2000)
Citing Cases
Utsey v. Coos County
More recent decisions sometimes employ the broader, more traditional use of the term as generally referring…
State v. Garcia"The inquiry is necessarily undertaken separately for each case because we consider whether the…