holding that defendant preserved a Johns-based argument when, in addition to broadly invoking OEC 404 and asserting that none of the exceptions to that rule applied, the defendant contended that the state did not allege that there was a "signature crime," because the defendant's reference to "signature crime" fairly alerted the trial court and the state that the Johns analysis was "fairly `in play'"
Summary of this case from State v. BorckMarch 8, 2000
holding that defendant preserved a Johns-based argument when, in addition to broadly invoking OEC 404 and asserting that none of the exceptions to that rule applied, the defendant contended that the state did not allege that there was a "signature crime," because the defendant's reference to "signature crime" fairly alerted the trial court and the state that the Johns analysis was "fairly `in play'"
Summary of this case from State v. BorckFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Mar 8, 2000
Petitioner ultimately entered a plea of "no contest" to one count of Burglary in the First Degree and one…
State v. Walter Carzil SeamonsEven if the evidence was erroneously admitted, in the light of defendant's admissions at trial, the error was…