holding in a client's action against insurance agents that, assuming that the right to a driver's license is a legally protected interest, it is primarily an economic interest and is not of sufficient importance
Summary of this case from Rathgeber v. James Hemenway, Inc.1995.
holding in a client's action against insurance agents that, assuming that the right to a driver's license is a legally protected interest, it is primarily an economic interest and is not of sufficient importance
Summary of this case from Rathgeber v. James Hemenway, Inc.holding that emotional distress damages related to a negligence claim by an insured against an insurance agent should have been stricken
Summary of this case from McCulloch v. Price Waterhouse LLPholding that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover emotional distress damages arising from the defendants' negligent failure to procure auto insurance coverage
Summary of this case from Curtis v. MRI Imaging Services IIFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
LUBA 94-002, 94-003; CA A85991Argued and submitted November 30, 1994, reversed and remanded for…
Tri-Met v. City of BeavertonDEITS, P.J. In Tri-Met v. City of Beaverton, 132 Or. App. 253, 888 P.2d 74, rev den 320 Or. 598 (1995), we…