rejecting contention that single incident of flooding can never result in compensable taking; although temporary flooding of plaintiffs' property did not support an inverse condemnation for taking of plaintiffs' land, it did support such a claim for the taking of plaintiffs' personal property destroyed in the flooding
Summary of this case from Warner/Elektra/Atlantic Corp. v. County of DuPageNovember 6, 1990.
rejecting contention that single incident of flooding can never result in compensable taking; although temporary flooding of plaintiffs' property did not support an inverse condemnation for taking of plaintiffs' land, it did support such a claim for the taking of plaintiffs' personal property destroyed in the flooding
Summary of this case from Warner/Elektra/Atlantic Corp. v. County of DuPageFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Nov 6, 1990
. Dulcich, 170 Or.App. 219, 237 n. 20, 12 P.3d 507 (2000) (declining to consider an issue not raised in…
Wilcox v. Board of ParoleThe petitioner was subject to ORS 144.103, providing that the term of post-prison supervision of a person…