Summary
holding that service by mail provision of ORCP 7 D satisfied requirements of due process
Summary of this case from Stricklin v. FlavelOpinion
March 2, 1982.
holding that service by mail provision of ORCP 7 D satisfied requirements of due process
Summary of this case from Stricklin v. FlavelMarch 2, 1982.
holding that service by mail provision of ORCP 7 D satisfied requirements of due process
Summary of this case from Stricklin v. FlavelFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Mar 2, 1982
It was amended on February 28, 1986, to add him as an additional defendant. In Shaughnessy v. Spray, 55 Or.…
Dortch v. A. H. Robins Co., Inc.The "date on which the * * * injury * * * complained of occurs" would appear to have a "common meaning";…