From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1996
324 Or. 394 (Or. 1996)

Summary

concluding that there was a settlement agree- ment where the parties' objective manifestations "have sufficiently expressed the terms they agreed upon"

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Haggerty

Opinion

1996.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1996
324 Or. 394 (Or. 1996)

concluding that there was a settlement agree- ment where the parties' objective manifestations "have sufficiently expressed the terms they agreed upon"

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Haggerty

affirming Commission's refusal to renew plaintiffs' licenses

Summary of this case from Lee v. Mitchell

discussing required factual showing in analogous context

Summary of this case from Tremaine v. Menken

reviewing for errors of law whether notice to the defendant was adequate

Summary of this case from Stricklin v. Flavel
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1996

Citations

324 Or. 394 (Or. 1996)

Citing Cases

In re Marriage of Haggerty

Husband contends that all the objective circumstances leave but one conclusion, as a matter of law, that the…

Carlson v. Martin

We have consistently recognized MVD service to be a form of service that, if used when authorized by the…