holding that the trial court lacked authority to renew spousal support payments pursuant to a motion that was filed after the expiration of time during which spousal support was required to be paid under the original judgment
Summary of this case from Harkins and HarkinsJanuary 15, 1980.
holding that the trial court lacked authority to renew spousal support payments pursuant to a motion that was filed after the expiration of time during which spousal support was required to be paid under the original judgment
Summary of this case from Harkins and HarkinsFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 15, 1980
On October 11, 1988, wife filed this motion. Under Park and Park, 43 Or. App. 367, 370, 602 P.2d 1123 (1979),…
Woita and WoitaThat holding has been reiterated over the years, recently in Pope and Pope, 301 Or. 42, 46, 718 P.2d 735…