holding that the defendant was not entitled to the choice-of-evils defense because the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence as to why it was "necessary" for him to kill a deer without first obtaining a permit to do so
Summary of this case from State v. Miles1987.
holding that the defendant was not entitled to the choice-of-evils defense because the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence as to why it was "necessary" for him to kill a deer without first obtaining a permit to do so
Summary of this case from State v. MilesFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1987
Id. at 308-09, 594 P.2d 1313.In State v. Twitty , 85 Or. App. 98, 106, 735 P.2d 1252, rev. den. , 304 Or. 56,…
Twitty v. MaassHowever, the amendment had an emergency clause and was effective on that date. State v. Twitty, 85 Or. App.…