From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 2, 2004
336 Or. 509 (Or. 2004)

Summary

filing an allegedly incorrect translation of an arbitration award might be intrinsic fraud, which pertains to the merits of the case, but it was not extrinsic fraud, which prevents a full trial of the matter, and so was not a basis for setting aside the judgment

Summary of this case from Mountain Woodworks v. Oregon

Opinion

March 2, 2004


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 2, 2004
336 Or. 509 (Or. 2004)

filing an allegedly incorrect translation of an arbitration award might be intrinsic fraud, which pertains to the merits of the case, but it was not extrinsic fraud, which prevents a full trial of the matter, and so was not a basis for setting aside the judgment

Summary of this case from Mountain Woodworks v. Oregon
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 2, 2004

Citations

336 Or. 509 (Or. 2004)
87 P.3d 1136

Citing Cases

State v. Stoudamire

In assessing probable cause, this court considers the totality of the circumstances. See, e.g., State v.…

State v. Turley

Whether objective probable cause exists is an issue that we review as a question of law. State v. Kappel, 190…