concluding that the plaintiff ordered into arbitration “did not ‘elect’ to pursue arbitration; rather, she was compelled to participate in arbitration as a consequence of her choice to pursue litigation”
Summary of this case from Cintas Corp. No. 3 v. Art Erickson Tire & Auto, Inc.1998.
concluding that the plaintiff ordered into arbitration “did not ‘elect’ to pursue arbitration; rather, she was compelled to participate in arbitration as a consequence of her choice to pursue litigation”
Summary of this case from Cintas Corp. No. 3 v. Art Erickson Tire & Auto, Inc.determining that the application of ORS 742.061 is not limited to instances in which the insurer disputes coverage
Summary of this case from Haynes v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transstating that " ORS 742.504 describes a particular type of arbitration—i.e. , arbitration that is pursued in lieu of litigation"
Summary of this case from Burns v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.disposing of similarly mislabeled cross-appeal by affirmance
Summary of this case from Lichau v. BaldwinFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
ORS 419B.185(1)(a), (c); ORS 419B.340(1); ORS 419B.476(2)(a); see also ORS 419B.337(1)(b) (requiring, in…
UBA Building Services, Inc. v. DavisDefendant requested reconsideration of the order of dismissal. Based on defendant's petition for…