invalidating covenant because it focused on the employee's association with another company, wherever located, which may be linked with the company's competitors within the restricted territory
Summary of this case from Asheboro Paper Packaging, Inc. v. Dickinson1990
invalidating covenant because it focused on the employee's association with another company, wherever located, which may be linked with the company's competitors within the restricted territory
Summary of this case from Asheboro Paper Packaging, Inc. v. Dickinsonstating that, "[w]hen the language in a contract is ambiguous, we view the practical result of the restriction by `construing the restriction strictly against its draftsman'"
Summary of this case from Underwood v. UnderwoodFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1990
Defendant argued that the noncompetition clause in question is reasonably necessary to protect its interest…
Wm. C. Vick Const. Co. v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut.Any doubt as to coverage is to be resolved in favor of the insured."); Duke Univ. v. St. Paul Fire Marine…