Summary
holding that mere speculation about how long a dangerous condition existed was not enough to create a material issue of fact for a jury
Summary of this case from Etheridge v. Elizabethan GardensOpinion
1985
holding that mere speculation about how long a dangerous condition existed was not enough to create a material issue of fact for a jury
Summary of this case from Etheridge v. Elizabethan Gardens1985
holding that mere speculation about how long a dangerous condition existed was not enough to create a material issue of fact for a jury
Summary of this case from Etheridge v. Elizabethan Gardensholding that mere speculation about how long a dangerous condition existed was not enough to create a material issue of fact for a jury
Summary of this case from Worthington v. Lionallowing expert medical witness to testify that taking and reporting vital signs of a deteriorating patient was the same for nurses in accredited hospitals across the country
Summary of this case from BAK v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY HOSPITAL SYSTEM, INCFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1985
Under North Carolina law, the insured "has the burden of bringing itself within the insuring language of the…
York v. Northern Hospital DistrictHowever, plaintiff did not lay a proper foundation for such testimony by showing that nurse Parker was…