From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1985
313 N.C. 329 (N.C. 1985)

Summary

holding that mere speculation about how long a dangerous condition existed was not enough to create a material issue of fact for a jury

Summary of this case from Etheridge v. Elizabethan Gardens

Opinion

1985


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1985
313 N.C. 329 (N.C. 1985)

holding that mere speculation about how long a dangerous condition existed was not enough to create a material issue of fact for a jury

Summary of this case from Etheridge v. Elizabethan Gardens

holding that mere speculation about how long a dangerous condition existed was not enough to create a material issue of fact for a jury

Summary of this case from Worthington v. Lion

allowing expert medical witness to testify that taking and reporting vital signs of a deteriorating patient was the same for nurses in accredited hospitals across the country

Summary of this case from BAK v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY HOSPITAL SYSTEM, INC
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1985

Citations

313 N.C. 329 (N.C. 1985)

Citing Cases

Wm. C. Vick Const. Co. v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut.

Under North Carolina law, the insured "has the burden of bringing itself within the insuring language of the…

York v. Northern Hospital District

However, plaintiff did not lay a proper foundation for such testimony by showing that nurse Parker was…