Summary
holding that evidence of deceptive conduct in connection with the sale of a restaurant is sufficient to establish an unfair and deceptive trade practice in violation of § 75-1.1
Summary of this case from Gress v. RowboatOpinion
1987
holding that evidence of deceptive conduct in connection with the sale of a restaurant is sufficient to establish an unfair and deceptive trade practice in violation of § 75-1.1
Summary of this case from Gress v. Rowboat1987
holding that evidence of deceptive conduct in connection with the sale of a restaurant is sufficient to establish an unfair and deceptive trade practice in violation of § 75-1.1
Summary of this case from Gress v. RowboatFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1987
In re Kittrell, 115 B.R. 873 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 1990). Once the fact finder determines whether a party…
Post Front Properties v. Roanoke ConstrucAs for the damages, the evidence is that defendant, after receiving assurance from the plaintiff that…