Petitions for Discretionary Review

Full title: PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 5, 1996

344 N.C. 439 (N.C. 1996)

344 N.C. 439

Opinion

474 S.E.2d 791 (N.C. 1996) 344 N.C. 439 N.C. STEEL, INC.; N.C. Steel Erectors, Inc.; N.C. Steel Management, Inc.; N.C. Steel Fabricators, Inc., Aircraft Services of Raleigh, Inc.; Montague Building Company; Smiths&sSmith, Surveyors, P.A., and North Carolina Marbles&sGranite v. NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSATION INSURANCE; National Workers' Compensation Reinsurance Pool; North Carolina Rate Bureau; Aetna Casualtys&sSurety Company; CIGNA Insurance Company and Ins. Co. of North America; Employers Ins. of Wausau, a Mutual Company; Fidelitys&sCasualty Co. of N.Y.; Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company; Michigan Mutual Insurance Company; National Surety Corporation; St. Paul Fires&sMarine Insurance Company; the Travelers Insurance Company; and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. No. 317PA96. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 5, 1996

       R. James Lore, Raleigh, Wood R. Foster, Jr., for N.C. Steel, Inc.

       James D. Blount, Jr., Raleigh, for Aetnas&sSurety Co.

       Pressly M. Millen, Raleigh, for National Councils&sWorker's Comp.

       R. Michael Strickland, Raleigh, for NC Rate Bureau.

       John R. Jolly, Jr., Raleigh, for CIGNAs&sIns. Co. of N. Amer.

       George R. Ragsdale, Raleigh, for Employers Ins. of Wausau.

       Dan M. Hartzog, Raleigh, for Fidelitys&sCasualty, NY.

Page 792

       Joseph W. Eason, Raleigh, for Hartford Underwr.s&sMichigan Mut.

       Denise Smith Cline, Raleigh, for Hartfords&sMichigan Ins.

       John B. McMillan, Raleigh, for Liberty Mutual.

       M. Keith Kapp, Raleigh, for National Surety.

       John L. Sarratt, Raleigh, for St. Paul Fires&sMarine.

       John F. Graybeal, Raleigh, for Travelers Ins.

       Douglas E. Kingsberry, for U.S. Fidelitys&sGuaranty.

       Prior report: 123 N.C.App. 163, 472 S.E.2d 578.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of September 1996."

       Plaintiffs shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

       Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).