From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 2, 1993
335 N.C. 243 (N.C. 1993)

Opinion


439 S.E.2d 164 (N.C. 1993) 335 N.C. 243 Richard WALKER, et al., Petitioners, v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT, COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION, Respondent, and Oriental Harbor Development Company, Inc., Respondent-Intervenor. ORIENTAL YACHT CLUB, Joseph H. Cox, et al., Petitioners, v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT, COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION, Respondent, and Oriental Harbor Development Company, Inc., Respondent-Intervenor. No. 419P93. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 2, 1993

       C.R. Wheatly, III, Beaufort, for respondent intervenor.

       Howard E. Manning, Edwin Pate Bailey, Raleigh, for petitioners.

       David G. Keeter, Associate Atty. Gen., Robin W. Smith, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., for Dept. of Environment.

       Prior report: 111 N.C.App. 851, 433 S.E.2d 767.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent Intervenor in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of December 1993."


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 2, 1993
335 N.C. 243 (N.C. 1993)
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 2, 1993

Citations

335 N.C. 243 (N.C. 1993)
335 N.C. 243

Citing Cases

Walker v. N.C. Coastal Resources Comm

This case is before us for the second time. See Walker v. N.C. Dept. of E.H.N.R., 111 N.C. App. 851, 433…

Rusher v. Tomlinson

Moreover, the original permit upon which petitioners base their appeal falls squarely within the exception…