Summary
affirming summary judgment where language of defendant's letter was too vague to be enforced as a promise
Summary of this case from Lassiter v. Bank of N.COpinion
1980
affirming summary judgment where language of defendant's letter was too vague to be enforced as a promise
Summary of this case from Lassiter v. Bank of N.C1980
affirming summary judgment where language of defendant's letter was too vague to be enforced as a promise
Summary of this case from Lassiter v. Bank of N.CFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1980
Defendants' argument as to vagueness and indefiniteness of the oral contract relies upon certain Court of…
Tucker v. WestlakeAlthough the trial court erred by admitting the copy of Mrs. Tucker's 1961 will into evidence, this does not…