holding that "where an unsuccessful motion to dismiss is grounded on an alleged insufficiency of the facts to state a claim for relief, and the case thereupon proceeds to judgment on the merits, the unsuccessful movant may not on an appeal from the final judgment seek review of the denial of the motion to dismiss"
Summary of this case from In re C.W1986
holding that "where an unsuccessful motion to dismiss is grounded on an alleged insufficiency of the facts to state a claim for relief, and the case thereupon proceeds to judgment on the merits, the unsuccessful movant may not on an appeal from the final judgment seek review of the denial of the motion to dismiss"
Summary of this case from In re C.Wfinding that the failure of appellant to "except and assign error separately to each finding or conclusion that he or she contends is not supported by the evidence . . . will result in waiver of the right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support particular findings of fact"
Summary of this case from Cherney v. N.C. Zoological Parkfinding that the failure of appellant to "except and assign error separately to each finding or conclusion that he or she contends is not supported by the evidence . . . will result in waiver of the right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support particular findings of fact"
Summary of this case from Okwara v. Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc.Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1986
Upon the defendants' motion, the trial court severed the two separate claims brought by Crump, and conducted…
Process Components, Inc. v. Baltimore AircoilThere is no precise definition of unfair or deceptive acts, but whether a particular act is unfair or…