holding that a tract was properly classified as six lots even though one lot had a residence on it, another had landscaping, and the owner considered the tract as one entity where estimate was based on recorded plats, tax maps, deeds, an aerial photograph and personal observation
Summary of this case from Thrash v. City of Asheville1982
holding that a tract was properly classified as six lots even though one lot had a residence on it, another had landscaping, and the owner considered the tract as one entity where estimate was based on recorded plats, tax maps, deeds, an aerial photograph and personal observation
Summary of this case from Thrash v. City of AshevilleFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1982
Moreover, this Court noted in Diaz that “ ‘the weight element upon a charge of trafficking in marijuana…
Zagaroli v. PollockHowever, there is no reversible error where maps and surveys are admitted for substantive purposes absent a…