Summary
holding for similar, though not identical, reasons that commodities transactions are not covered by the Act
Summary of this case from Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford FarmsOpinion
1979
holding for similar, though not identical, reasons that commodities transactions are not covered by the Act
Summary of this case from Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms1979
holding for similar, though not identical, reasons that commodities transactions are not covered by the Act
Summary of this case from Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford FarmsFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1979
An action for divorce from bed and board will support an award of permanent alimony, child support and…
Whittaker v. Furniture Factory Outlet ShopsThe issue may be raised by the appellate court on its own motion, even when not raised by the parties. Bache…