From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1983
309 N.C. 633 (N.C. 1983)

Summary

finding plaintiff's action time barred because the summons was not issued until after the five-day period following the filing of the complaint and after the running of the statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Melvin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Opinion

1983


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1983
309 N.C. 633 (N.C. 1983)

finding plaintiff's action time barred because the summons was not issued until after the five-day period following the filing of the complaint and after the running of the statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Melvin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1983

Citations

309 N.C. 633 (N.C. 1983)

Citing Cases

In re Rogers

On appeal, this Court affirmed the order of the trial court. In re Rogers, 63 N.C. App. 705, 306 S.E.2d 510,…

Tyson v. L'Eggs Products, Inc.

The function of an alias and pluries summons is to keep a lawsuit alive and maintain the original date of the…