holding that the "defendant was not required to object at the sentencing hearing in order to assert the insufficiency of the [State's] remarks as a matter of law to prove his prior convictions by a preponderance of the evidence."
Summary of this case from State v. Jeffery1988
holding that the "defendant was not required to object at the sentencing hearing in order to assert the insufficiency of the [State's] remarks as a matter of law to prove his prior convictions by a preponderance of the evidence."
Summary of this case from State v. JefferyFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1988
Defendant asserts that the State did not present substantial evidence that he acted in concert with Benson or…
State v. WilliamsTo be convicted of a crime under the theory of acting in concert, the defendant need not do any particular…