Petitions for Discretionary Review

Full title: PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 12, 1996

345 N.C. 182 (N.C. 1996)

345 N.C. 182

Opinion

478 S.E.2d 15 (N.C. 1996) 345 N.C. 182 STATE of North Carolina v. Amy Jane SISK No. 371A96. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 12, 1996

       Paul M. James, Winston-Salem, for Sisk.

       William Farrell, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Thomas Keith, District Attorney, for State.

       Prior report: 123 N.C.App. 361, 473 S.E.2d 348.

       ORDER

       As to Question Number 2 presented in Defendant's Petition for Discretionary Review: "Whether it was error for the Court to fail to dismiss the Indictment against the Defendant at the close of the State's evidence as being fatally defective?", the petition is allowed to consider that question.

       As to all other questions raised in the defendant's Petition for Discretionary Review, the petition is denied.