From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 4, 1989
324 N.C. 436 (N.C. 1989)

Opinion


379 S.E.2d 250 (N.C. 1989) 324 N.C. 436 Doyle K. WALSH and Curtis M. Dail v. Ruth Paxon M. HOLZ. No. 120P89. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 4, 1989

       Prior report: 92 N.C.App. 757, 377 S.E.2d 824.

       Vannoy, Moore, Colvard, Tripletts&sFreeman, North Wilkesboro, for plaintiffs.

       Wards&sSmith, for defendant.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 1989."


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 4, 1989
324 N.C. 436 (N.C. 1989)
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 4, 1989

Citations

324 N.C. 436 (N.C. 1989)
324 N.C. 436

Citing Cases

Stark Law Grp., PLLC v. Newton

See Tolaram Fibers, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.,92 N.C.App. 713, 718–19, 375 S.E.2d 673, 676 (“Defendants contend…

Pinnacle Group, Inc. v. Shrader

Our Court recognizes that a party's entitlement to attorneys' fees is a question of substantive law. Tolarem…