From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1996
343 N.C. 755 (N.C. 1996)

Summary

stating that "[i]f there is substantial evidence of the essential elements of the offense charged, or of a lesser included offense, and of defendant being the perpetrator, `the trial court must deny the motion to dismiss . . . and submit [the charge] to the jury. . . .'" State v. McAvoy, 331 N.C. 583, 589, 417 S.E.2d 489, 493

Summary of this case from State v. Burroughs

Opinion

1996


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1996
343 N.C. 755 (N.C. 1996)

stating that "[i]f there is substantial evidence of the essential elements of the offense charged, or of a lesser included offense, and of defendant being the perpetrator, `the trial court must deny the motion to dismiss . . . and submit [the charge] to the jury. . . .'" State v. McAvoy, 331 N.C. 583, 589, 417 S.E.2d 489, 493

Summary of this case from State v. Burroughs
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1996

Citations

343 N.C. 755 (N.C. 1996)

Citing Cases

State v. Woods

Blankenship does not apply to general intent crimes. Evans, 346 N.C. at ___, 485 S.E.2d at ___ (citing State…

State v. White

When ruling on a motion to dismiss, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the…