holding that "because the disposition of such cases is highly fact-specific, the abuse-of-discretion standard is the appropriate standard of review"
Summary of this case from Cable Tel Services, Inc. v. Overland Contracting, Inc.1998
holding that "because the disposition of such cases is highly fact-specific, the abuse-of-discretion standard is the appropriate standard of review"
Summary of this case from Cable Tel Services, Inc. v. Overland Contracting, Inc.Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Similarly, North Carolina jurisprudence has long held the proposition that "an expert is not competent to…
Deaton v. Wal-Mart, Inc.Similarly, North Carolina jurisprudence has long held the proposition that "an expert is not competent to…