From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 6, 1989
325 N.C. 274 (N.C. 1989)

Opinion


384 S.E.2d 523 (N.C. 1989) 325 N.C. 274 STATE of North Carolina v. Claude E. HARTNESS. No. 258PA89. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 6, 1989

       Prior report: 94 N.C.App. 224, 381 S.E.2d 202.

       Marilyn R. Mudge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

       Mark D. Montgomery, Asst. Appellate Defender, for Defendant.

       Roy Patton, Dist. Atty.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of September 1989."

       Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by defendant in this matter for a writ of certiorari as to an issue not presented to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of September 1989."

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General for Writ of Supersedeas and Temporary Stay of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Supersedeas allowed. By order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of September 1989."


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 6, 1989
325 N.C. 274 (N.C. 1989)
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 6, 1989

Citations

325 N.C. 274 (N.C. 1989)
325 N.C. 274

Citing Cases

State v. Smith

"A defendant removed from the courtroom must be given the opportunity of learning of the trial proceedings…

State v. Piche

"Disagreement over trial tactics and communication problems generally do not make the assistance of counsel…