From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1985
314 N.C. 114 (N.C. 1985)

Summary

explaining that to be extreme and outrageous, conduct must “go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and ... be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community” (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, cmt. d)

Summary of this case from Rouse v. Duke Univ.

Opinion

1985


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1985
314 N.C. 114 (N.C. 1985)

explaining that to be extreme and outrageous, conduct must “go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and ... be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community” (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, cmt. d)

Summary of this case from Rouse v. Duke Univ.

disallowing recovery for emotional distress because the alleged conduct was not directed at the parents

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Caparelli
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1985

Citations

314 N.C. 114 (N.C. 1985)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Bollinger

We first determine if defendant's conduct represents extreme and outrageous conduct. In Briggs v. Rosenthal,…

Wagoner v. Elkin City Schools' Bd. of Educ

Whether or not conduct constitutes extreme and outrageous behavior is initially a question of law for the…