Summary
holding that a defendant's failure to demonstrate the content of the evidence he contends was erroneously excluded, precludes appellate review of the contested issue
Summary of this case from State v. OwenOpinion
1994
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1994
335 N.C. 563 (N.C. 1994)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1994
335 N.C. 563 (N.C. 1994)
holding that a defendant's failure to demonstrate the content of the evidence he contends was erroneously excluded, precludes appellate review of the contested issue
Summary of this case from State v. Owenconcluding trial court did not err in admitting testimony describing general symptoms and characteristics of sexually abused children to explain the victim's behavior
Summary of this case from State v. Shoreconcluding trial court did not err in admitting testimony describing general symptoms and characteristics of sexually abused children to explain the victim's behavior
Summary of this case from State v. Shoreconcluding trial court did not err in admitting testimony describing general symptoms and characteristics of sexually abused children to explain the victim's behavior
Summary of this case from State v. Carpenterstating that the word “victim” is included in the North Carolina pattern jury instructions and used regularly to instruct on rape and sexual offenses
Summary of this case from State v. TarletonCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
Citations
335 N.C. 563 (N.C. 1994)
Citing Cases
State v. Carpenter
Evidence similar to that offered by Vaughn has been held admissible to assist the jury. See State v. Bailey,…
State v. Withers"[I]n order to prevail under the plain error rule, [a] defendant must convince this Court that (1) there was…