holding that the defendant may not argue a particular alleged error "on appeal where the underlying objection fails to present the nature of the alleged error to the trial court" This rule "serves to facilitate proper rulings and to enable opposing counsel to take proper corrective measures to avoid retrial"
Summary of this case from State v. Sturdivant1986
holding that the defendant may not argue a particular alleged error "on appeal where the underlying objection fails to present the nature of the alleged error to the trial court" This rule "serves to facilitate proper rulings and to enable opposing counsel to take proper corrective measures to avoid retrial"
Summary of this case from State v. SturdivantFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1986
Expert opinion of the rate at which a body eliminates alcohol has been admitted, either without defendant's…
Williams v. CurrieMoreover, the range of cases wherein probation or active time can be imposed is greatly expanded over that of…