Summary
holding that where a trial court is simply repeating or clarifying instructions in response to a jury's question, such comments are not "additional instructions"
Summary of this case from State v. RobinsonOpinion
Daniel F. McLawhorn, Kathryn Jones Cooper, Special Deputy Attorneys General, Sarah Y. Meacham, Assistant Attorney General, for Environmental Division.
Thomas E. Terrell, High Point, Lloyd Hise, Jr., Spruce Pine, for Town of Spruce Pine.
Ronald W. Howell, Burnsville, Joseph W. Seegers, County Attorney, for Avery County.
Prior report: 123 N.C.App. 704, 475 S.E.2d 233.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Attorney General in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of October 1996."
Accordingly, the new brief of the Defendant shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.