Summary
acknowledging the propriety of the propounders moving for directed verdict at the close of all evidence in a caveat proceeding but denying that motion based on the evidence
Summary of this case from In re Will of SmithOpinion
1990
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1990
326 N.C. 48 (N.C. 1990)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1990
326 N.C. 48 (N.C. 1990)
acknowledging the propriety of the propounders moving for directed verdict at the close of all evidence in a caveat proceeding but denying that motion based on the evidence
Summary of this case from In re Will of SmithCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1990
Citations
326 N.C. 48 (N.C. 1990)
Citing Cases
United Dominion Industries, v. Overhead Door Corp.
However, given the trend toward use of the most significant relationship test in tort actions in general, the…
Mothershed v. Schrimsher"The burden of establishing that there is no material factual issue to litigate and [that] summary judgment…