Summary
holding that there was no "inherent conflict . . . between arbitration and the underlying purpose of [the Consumer Fraud Act]"
Summary of this case from Halprin v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLCOpinion
2002
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Certification
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 1, 2002
171 N.J. 445 (N.J. 2002)
Summaries of
Petitions for Certification
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 1, 2002
171 N.J. 445 (N.J. 2002)
holding that there was no "inherent conflict . . . between arbitration and the underlying purpose of [the Consumer Fraud Act]"
Summary of this case from Halprin v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLCfinding no conflict between arbitration and Consumer Fraud Act; reasoning that plaintiffs can vindicate statutory rights in arbitral forum
Summary of this case from Martindale v. Sandvikaddressing the CFA
Summary of this case from Pop Test Cortisol, LLC v. Merck & Co.Case details for
Petitions for Certification
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIFICATION
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: Jan 1, 2002
Citations
171 N.J. 445 (N.J. 2002)
793 A.2d 715
Citing Cases
Muhammad v. County
In upholding the class-arbitration bar specifically, the Appellate Division relied on its earlier decision in…
Waskevich v. Herold Law, P.A.Curtis, supra, 413 N.J.Super. at 35–36, 992 A.2d 795 (quoting Gras v. Assocs. First Capital Corp., 346…