finding that the prosecutor's comments during summation about defense counsel's role in distorting the facts, by themselves, were not "sufficiently egregious to deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial," where the judge immediately instructed the jury to ignore the comment about the alibi being "concocted" with defense counsel
Summary of this case from State v. Daniels2001
finding that the prosecutor's comments during summation about defense counsel's role in distorting the facts, by themselves, were not "sufficiently egregious to deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial," where the judge immediately instructed the jury to ignore the comment about the alibi being "concocted" with defense counsel
Summary of this case from State v. DanielsFull title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIFICATION
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: Jan 1, 2001
We granted plaintiff's petition for certification. 169 N.J. 610 (2001).…
Wubshet v. Cal. ApartmentsJudge Littlefield concluded that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 46:8-21.1 and our decision in Yi v. Re/Max Fortune…