Summary
explaining appeal is only required when re-filing charges would inevitably fail to cure defect which warranted dismissal
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. PetersonOpinion
1997
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1997
546 Pa. 691 (Pa. 1997)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1997
546 Pa. 691 (Pa. 1997)
explaining appeal is only required when re-filing charges would inevitably fail to cure defect which warranted dismissal
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. PetersonCase details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Citations
546 Pa. 691 (Pa. 1997)
Citing Cases
Commonwealth v. Peterson
The Commonwealth did not have to appeal the court's dismissal of the charges prior to re-filing the complaint…
Commonwealth v. KinardId. Our Supreme Court thus ruled that the evidence was relevant to prove that the second death was a…