From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 1, 1997
695 A.2d 783 (Pa. 1997)

Opinion

March-December 1997.


Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation _____________________ _________ _________ ___________ ____________________

New Brighton Area School Dist. v. New Brighton Education Ass'n, ........ 5/27/97 0466 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., 677 W.D. A.2d 404 (1996) NGK Metals v. W.C.A.B. (Culley); Culley, Petition of ............... 7/1/97 757 Denied No. 991 C.D. 1996 M.D. (1996) Rabiega v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections ... 7/1/97 91 M.D. Denied No. 44 C.D. 1997 (1997)

Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this Matter.

Rutt v. W.C.A.B. (Elf Atochem North America) ......... 7/1/97 26 M.D. Denied No. 1720 C.D. (1997) 1996

Samuel Rappaport Ltd. Partnership v. Tax Review Bd. of the City of Philadelphia v. Tax Review Bd. of the City of Philadelphia to the Use of Samuel Rappaport Ltd. Partnership ...... 5/15/97 870, 871 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., 682 E.D. A.2d 862 (1996)

Shohola Falls Trails End Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Shohola Tp. Pike County, ..... 6/13/97 0470 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., 679 M.D. A.2d 1335 (1996)

Simpson, Petition of ............... 4/30/97 0177 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., 692 E.D. A.2d 1192 (1997)

Simpson v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole ....... 4/17/97 021 Denied No. 141 C.D. 1997 M.D. (1997)


Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 1, 1997
695 A.2d 783 (Pa. 1997)
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 1, 1997

Citations

695 A.2d 783 (Pa. 1997)
695 A.2d 783

Citing Cases

Laurel Point v. Susquehanna Tp. ZHB

In such a case, the issuance of a variance is necessary to permit a reasonable use of the land and, thus,…

WOLL v. MONAGHAN TP

Rather, Landowners, the parties challenging the Ordinance, had the initial burden to demonstrate that there…