Summary
implying the existence of a per se rule by finding defendant's belief unreasonable after simply noting that the decedent was unarmed
Summary of this case from Com. v. SotoOpinion
1991
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1991
528 Pa. 636 (Pa. 1991)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1991
528 Pa. 636 (Pa. 1991)
implying the existence of a per se rule by finding defendant's belief unreasonable after simply noting that the decedent was unarmed
Summary of this case from Com. v. SotoCase details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
Citations
528 Pa. 636 (Pa. 1991)
Citing Cases
Com. v. Yanoff
Commonwealth v. McClain, 402 Pa. Super. 636, 642, 587 A.2d 798, 801, alloc. den., 528 Pa. 636, 598 A.2d…
Com. v. WarrickThe precise question raised instantly, whether appellant's double jeopardy rights were violated, was decided…