Summary
stating hearing not necessary where disputed facts are irrelevant to court's disposition
Summary of this case from Marra v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationOpinion
1996
stating hearing not necessary where disputed facts are irrelevant to court's disposition
Summary of this case from Marra v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation1996
stating hearing not necessary where disputed facts are irrelevant to court's disposition
Summary of this case from Marra v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
Such a statement may be admissible to rehabilitate the witness if the prior consistent statement was made…
Orange Stones Co. v. City of ReadingWe initially note that this Court's scope of review in a mandamus action is limited to determining whether…