Summary
rejecting technical waiver argument premised upon defendant's alleged post trial procedural default when trial judge fully addressed merits of claims raised on appeal
Summary of this case from Com. v. NeitzelOpinion
1989
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1989
522 Pa. 583 (Pa. 1989)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1989
522 Pa. 583 (Pa. 1989)
rejecting technical waiver argument premised upon defendant's alleged post trial procedural default when trial judge fully addressed merits of claims raised on appeal
Summary of this case from Com. v. Neitzelnoting that questions directed at children on both direct and cross-examination should be direct rather than convoluted or compound questions, and that questions should be phrased in simple language
Summary of this case from Com. v. DunkleCase details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1989
Citations
522 Pa. 583 (Pa. 1989)
Citing Cases
Commonwealth v. Metz
We recognize that exceptions to this rule have been made in certain limited circumstances — specifically,…
Commonwealth v. LopezThis Court has deemed an appellate claim that testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay waived where, at…