Summary
stating if one party disagrees with the other party's valuation, it is his burden to provide the court with an alternative valuation
Summary of this case from Smith v. SmithOpinion
1995
stating if one party disagrees with the other party's valuation, it is his burden to provide the court with an alternative valuation
Summary of this case from Smith v. Smith1995
stating if one party disagrees with the other party's valuation, it is his burden to provide the court with an alternative valuation
Summary of this case from Smith v. Smithstating if one party disagrees with the other party's valuation, it is his burden to provide the court with an alternative valuation
Summary of this case from Baker v. BakerFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
The trial court must exercise discretion and rely on the estimates, inventories, records of purchase prices,…
Shirley by Shirley v. JavanThis petition was denied. Shirley v. Javan, 541 Pa. 641, 663 A.2d 693 (1995). Thereafter, on November 13,…