Summary
holding that Pennsylvania's guilty but mentally ill statute comports with constitutional requirements of due process and equal protection
Summary of this case from Com. v. YasipourOpinion
1996
holding that Pennsylvania's guilty but mentally ill statute comports with constitutional requirements of due process and equal protection
Summary of this case from Com. v. Yasipour1996
holding that Pennsylvania's guilty but mentally ill statute comports with constitutional requirements of due process and equal protection
Summary of this case from Com. v. Yasipourfinding that prosecution's comments regarding credibility were permissible when they were motivated by defense counsel's prior attacks on Commonwealth witnesses' credibility
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. DrummondFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
However, it is well settled that it is within the discretion of the trial court to determine the scope and…
Commonwealth v. ShotwellOn this basis, we could deny further review of appellant's restitution issue. See generally Commonwealth…