Summary
stating fact that defendant was focus of investigation is relevant for custody determination but does not per se require Miranda warnings
Summary of this case from Com. v. LevanduskiOpinion
1994
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1994
538 Pa. 668 (Pa. 1994)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1994
538 Pa. 668 (Pa. 1994)
stating fact that defendant was focus of investigation is relevant for custody determination but does not per se require Miranda warnings
Summary of this case from Com. v. LevanduskiCase details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
Citations
538 Pa. 668 (Pa. 1994)
Citing Cases
Commonwealth v. P.B.B.
Commonwealth v. Clayton Williams, 539 Pa. 61, 74, 650 A.2d 420, 427 (1994) (internal citations omitted). See…
Com. v. WilliamsCommonwealth v. Clayton Williams, 539 Pa. 61, 74, 650 A.2d 420, 427 (1994) (internal citations omitted). See…