Summary
affirming trial court's exclusion of videotape of defendant's hypnotic interview and of the psychiatrist's testimony as to the defendant's statements made while under hypnosis
Summary of this case from Liles v. BalmerOpinion
1991
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1991
528 Pa. 629 (Pa. 1991)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1991
528 Pa. 629 (Pa. 1991)
affirming trial court's exclusion of videotape of defendant's hypnotic interview and of the psychiatrist's testimony as to the defendant's statements made while under hypnosis
Summary of this case from Liles v. BalmerCase details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
Citations
528 Pa. 629 (Pa. 1991)
Citing Cases
Com. v. McCloskey
ra (new trial awarded for defendant charged and tried on third-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter,…
Turner v. RansomAs to the potential to use the evidence to demonstrate Appellant's incapacity to form the specific intent to…