holding that plaintiffs must prove elements of common law fraud to recover under the UTPCPL's catch-all provision because that provision forbids only "fraudulent" conduct
Summary of this case from Landau v. Viridian Energy PA LLC1994
holding that plaintiffs must prove elements of common law fraud to recover under the UTPCPL's catch-all provision because that provision forbids only "fraudulent" conduct
Summary of this case from Landau v. Viridian Energy PA LLCholding that in order to recover under the prohibition on fraudulent conduct under the UTPCPL, elements of common-law fraud must be proven
Summary of this case from Weisblatt v. Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co.holding plaintiff must prove elements of common law fraud to recover under UTPCPL catchall because section forbids only “fraudulent” conduct
Summary of this case from Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
As to her claims of common law fraud, fraudulent violation of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and…
Thomeier v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.To constitute an effective waiver, a contractual provision "must specifically provide that a named employer…