Summary
finding substantial question exists upon challenge that sentencing court failed to articulate its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. L.NOpinion
1997
finding substantial question exists upon challenge that sentencing court failed to articulate its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. L.N1997
finding substantial question exists upon challenge that sentencing court failed to articulate its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. L.NFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
As this testimony indicates, rather than claiming appellants violated the Orders of May 9 and October 13,…
Commonwealth v. L.NHowever, the claim that a sentencing court has failed to state adequate reasons on the record for the…