Summary
stating statutory immunity under Workers' Compensation Act is affirmative defense that is properly raised in new matter rather than by preliminary objections to complaint
Summary of this case from Warner v. B. Pietrini & SonsOpinion
1992
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1992
532 Pa. 657 (Pa. 1992)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1992
532 Pa. 657 (Pa. 1992)
stating statutory immunity under Workers' Compensation Act is affirmative defense that is properly raised in new matter rather than by preliminary objections to complaint
Summary of this case from Warner v. B. Pietrini & Sonsstating statutory immunity under WCA is affirmative defense that is properly raised in new matter rather than by preliminary objections to complaint
Summary of this case from Soto v. Nabisco, Inc.Case details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Citations
532 Pa. 657 (Pa. 1992)
Citing Cases
Brown v. Candelelora
See also: General Accident Insurance Co. v. Federal KemperInsurance Co., 452 Pa. Super. 581, 589, 682 A.2d…
Warner v. B. Pietrini & SonsPa.R.C.P. 1030(a). For example, statutory immunity from suit is not properly raised in preliminary objections…