Summary
declining to remand for resentencing despite illegality of one sentence because sentences were to run concurrently
Summary of this case from Kendrick v. DistOpinion
1997
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1997
540 Pa. 612 (Pa. 1997)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1997
540 Pa. 612 (Pa. 1997)
declining to remand for resentencing despite illegality of one sentence because sentences were to run concurrently
Summary of this case from Kendrick v. DistCase details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Citations
540 Pa. 612 (Pa. 1997)
Citing Cases
State v. Doriguzzi
and acceptability of the test. See, e.g., Ex parte Malone v. City of Silverhill, 575 So.2d 106 (Ala. 1990);…
Kendrick v. DistCommonwealth argues that there is no need to remand for resentencing. Although it eschews reliance on the…