From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 1, 1996
680 A.2d 1158 (Pa. 1996)

Opinion

May-July 1996.


Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation _______________________ _______ _________ ___________ ___________

Durbas v. Anderson .......... 6/25/96 053 Denied 449 Pa.Super. E.D. 730, (1996) 674 A.2d 322

Reconsideration denied Aug. 2, 1996.

Fondelier v. Fry ....... 8/1/96 213 Granted 442 Pa.Super. W.D. (0044 684, (1995) W.D. 660 A.2d 660 1996)

Forman v. Rossman ..... 7/24/96 278 Granted 449 Pa.Super. E.D. (0057 34, (1996) E.D. 672 A.2d 1341 1996)

Justice RUSSELL M. NIGRO did not participate inthe consideration or decision of this matter.

Harris Communication Corp. v. WMMR-FM Group W. Radio ....... 7/9/96 162 Denied 450 Pa.Super. E.D. 723, (1996) 676 A.2d 289

Heil v. Centralized Comprehensive Human Services, Inc. . 7/8/96 713 Denied 443 Pa. Super. E.D. 502, (1995) 662 A.2d 669

Helmick v. M.A.T. Oil Gas Exploration, Inc. ................. 7/24/96 0134 Denied 451 Pa.Super. W.D. 580, (1996) 677 A.2d 1270

Helwig Co., Inc. v. B.H.R. Associates, Inc. ................. 7/26/96 0284 Denied 451 Pa.Super. M.D. 635, (1996) 679 A.2d 261

Highway Service, Inc. v. CNA Ins. Companies ............ 5/3/96 007 Denied 448 Pa.Super. E.D. 660, (1996) 671 A.2d 776

Laing v. Motycki ....... 7/25/96 166, 167 Denied 451 Pa.Super. W.D. 582, (1996) 677 A.2d 1271

Mahan v. Richmond ...... 8/5/96 141 Denied 451 Pa.Super. W.D. 582, (1996) 677 A.2d 1271


Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 1, 1996
680 A.2d 1158 (Pa. 1996)
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 1, 1996

Citations

680 A.2d 1158 (Pa. 1996)
680 A.2d 1158

Citing Cases

Techtmann v. Howie

We affirm. In reviewing an order transferring venue under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, we determine…

Aerospace Finance v. New Hampshire Ins. Co.

[C]learly adduces facts that either (1) establish such oppressiveness and vexation to a defendant as to be…