holding that an arbitration award based on the conclusion that unappended waiver forms are unenforceable pursuant to public policy is not reviewable by the courts because, as stated in Schultz, it is not based on an allegation that a specific provision in an insurance policy contravenes public policy
Summary of this case from Hartford Ins. Co. v. O'Mara1998
holding that an arbitration award based on the conclusion that unappended waiver forms are unenforceable pursuant to public policy is not reviewable by the courts because, as stated in Schultz, it is not based on an allegation that a specific provision in an insurance policy contravenes public policy
Summary of this case from Hartford Ins. Co. v. O'MaraFull title:PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Rather § 8371 provides an independent cause of action to an insured that is not dependant upon success on the…
Michael v. StockIn addition, and more fundamentally, we have observed that bad faith claims "are distinct from the underlying…