Opinion
2:19-CV-0667-TLN-DMC-P
12-20-2021
SIDNEY PETILLO, Plaintiff, v. HAINEY, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs motion, ECF No. 71, for a “summary judgment conference.” This motion appears to be a duplicate of a motion filed by Plaintiff on May 10, 2021, and denied by the Court on May 17, 2021. The current filing is not a motion for summary judgment as erroneously indicated in the May 17, 2021, order. As with Plaintiffs filing addressed in the May 17, 2021, order, Plaintiffs current motion is denied because the Eastern District of California Local Rules specify that all motions in prisoner cases be heard on the papers without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.