Pethtel v. West Virginia State Police

Full title: CAROL PETHTEL, individually and in her capacity as Administratrix of the…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Jan 23, 2008

Civil Action No. 5:06CV87 (STAMP) (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 23, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 5:06CV87 (STAMP).

January 23, 2008

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT'S ANTICIPATED TESTIMONY

FREDERICK STAMP JR., District Judge

On January 22, 2008, the plaintiffs in the above-styled civil action filed a motion for an extension of time to file responses in opposition to the defendants' motion for summary judgment and to the defendants' motion to strike expert testimony. The plaintiffs' motion requests a due date of January 28, 2008 for their response, with a concomitant extension to February 4, 2008 for the defendants' reply. In their motion, the plaintiffs also inform this Court that the defendants do not object to the proposed extension.

This Court finds that the plaintiffs have shown good cause, and, accordingly, the plaintiffs' motion for an extension of time to files responses to the defendants' motion for summary judgment and to the defendants' motion to strike expert testimony is hereby GRANTED. The plaintiffs shall file their response on or before January 28, 2008 . The defendants' reply brief shall be filed on or before February 4, 2008 .

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to counsel of record herein.